Note: A report is not written like a paper. Please use the demonstrates a high degree of critical thinking, is consistent in accurately interpreting questions & material; provides solid assumptions, reasoning & claims; thorough analysis & evaluation with sound conclusions shows good critical thinking; accurately interprets most questions & material; usually identifies relevant arguments/reasoning/claims; offers good analysis & evaluation with fairly sound conclusions shows occasional critical thinking; questions & material is at times accurately interpreted; arguments/reasoning/claims are occasionally explained; offers fair analysis & evaluation with a conclusion shows little critical thinking, misinterprets questions or material; ignores or superficially evaluates; justifies little and seldom explains reasoning; draws unwarranted conclusions lacks critical thinking consistently offers biased interpretations; ignores or superficially evaluates; argues using poor reasoning, and/or unwarranted claims arguments or positions are well-supported with evidence from the readings/experience; ideas go beyond the course material and recognize implications and extensions of the material and concepts arguments or positions are mostly supported by evidence from the readings and course content; ideas presented demonstrate student’s understanding of the material and concepts arguments are more often based on opinion or unclear views than on position grounded in the readings of material or external sources of material arguments are frequently ill
ogical and unsubstantiated; student may resort to ad hominem attacks on the author instead of making meaningful application of the material arguments lack meaningful explanation or support of ideas demonstrated full understanding of requirements responded to each aspect of assignment demonstrated understanding of requirements; missed one minor aspect of assignment demonstrated some understanding of requirements; missed a key element or two minor aspects of assignment failed to show a firm understanding of requirement; missed two key elements or several minor aspects of assignment did not demonstrate understanding of assignment requirements writing is clear and easy to follow; grammar and spelling are all correct; formatting gives a professional look and adds to readability most ideas are presented clearly; occasional spelling and/or grammar issues wordy; some points require rereading to understand fully; more than an occasional spelling and/or grammar unclear and difficult to understand; frequent spelling and grammar issues largely incomprehensible writing/poorly written in terms of mechanics and structure no APA style errors attempts in-text citation and reference list but 1 or 2 APA style errors are present attempts in-text citation and reference list; APA style errors are present; inconsistencies in citation usage can be found throughout the document attempts either in-text citation or reference list but omits the other no attempt at APA style Purchase the answer to view it Purchase the answer to view it Purchase the answer to view it